Phillis Wheatley On Being Brought From Africa To America

The Girl Who Wrote Her Way Out of Chains

Phillis Wheatley stepped off the slave ship in Boston harbor in 1761, no older than seven years old. She was barefoot, wearing nothing but a checked tartan short coat and a strip of printed cotton around her shoulders. The ship's surgeon, John Mitchell, later wrote that she looked "like a creature just dropped from the moon." But here's what most people miss: that same girl would grow up to become the first published African American author in American history.

The story of how she got from the coast of West Africa to the printing press in colonial Boston is one of the strangest, most remarkable journeys in American literature. It's not just about survival — it's about a mind that refused to be broken, even when everything around it screamed that it should be.

What Actually Happened to Phillis Wheatley

The details of Phillis Wheatley's early life in Africa remain frustratingly unclear. Here's the thing — she was likely captured in what is now Senegal or Gambia, probably from a Fulani or Wolof-speaking community. What we know for certain is that she was sold into the transatlantic slave trade, shipped across the ocean in the holds of a British vessel, and purchased by John Wheatley, a prosperous Boston merchant, for what would amount to a few weeks' wages.

John and Susanna Wheatley treated Phillis differently from the start — or at least, they made different choices about her education. While their other enslaved people worked the household and grounds, Phillis was taught to read, write, and recite Scripture. By her teens, she had absorbed the Bible, John Milton's Paradise Lost*, and the poetry of Thomas Gray so thoroughly that she could quote entire passages from memory.

But here's the thing that historians still debate: was this education an act of genuine affection, Christian charity, or something more complicated? The Wheatleys lived in a world where owning another human being was legal and normal. Yet they also raised Phillis as almost a member of the family, dressing her finely, sending her to visit neighbors, and eventually supporting her literary ambitions.

Why Her Story Matters More Than You Think

Most people encounter Phillis Wheatley in school as a footnote — a curious exception to the rule that enslaved people couldn't read or write. But that misses the point entirely. Still, her existence as a published poet in 1773 wasn't just unusual; it was revolutionary. She forced white America to confront a question they'd rather avoid: if an enslaved person could write poetry that rivaled the best English literature, what did that say about the foundations of slavery itself?

When she published Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral* in London, she didn't just become famous — she became dangerous. Her very success undermined the pseudoscientific racism that justified the slave trade. How could you claim Black people were intellectually inferior when one had just published a book of poetry that made John Adams say she had "great genius"?

And yet, her story also reveals how narrow the paths to recognition were for Black Americans. She had to be brilliant, she had to write religious poetry, she had to be endorsed by white patrons, and she had to leave America entirely to find a publisher willing to print her work. The system that celebrated her genius still denied her basic human freedom.

How She Actually Wrote Her Way to Freedom

The technical craft of Wheatley's writing is where things get fascinating. She mastered the heroic couplet — those tight, rhyming pairs of lines that were the gold standard of 18th-century English poetry. But she didn't just copy the form; she bent it to her own experience.

Take her poem "On Being Brought from Africa to America." In just twelve lines, she packs in theology, personal testimony, and a quiet but devastating argument about spiritual equality:

"Twas mercy brought me from my Pagan land,
And taught my benighted soul to understand
That there's a Christ, yea, there's a sinner saved
By grace, and by His blood, and by His cross..."

The poem works on multiple levels. On the surface, it's a conversion narrative — a Black woman thanking God for bringing her to Christian civilization. But read closer, and you see the blade twist: if salvation comes through Christ and is available to all souls regardless of race, then what does that mean for the institution holding her in bondage?

She was particularly skilled at what scholars call "strategic ambiguity" — saying things that sounded acceptable to white readers while carrying deeper meanings for those who needed to hear them. On top of that, when she wrote about Pharaoh being "drowned in the Red Sea's flood," some readers heard a biblical lesson. Others heard something else entirely.

What Most People Get Wrong About Her

Here's where the popular narrative falls apart: people treat Phillis Wheatley as if she was uniquely gifted, a natural prodigy who transcended slavery through sheer talent. That's not wrong exactly — she was extraordinarily talented. But it's incomplete.

The real story isn't that she rose above slavery despite being enslaved. On top of that, it's that she rose above it because* she was enslaved — because the system that tried to strip her of identity, language, and culture instead gave her something to write against. Her poetry draws its power from the tension between her circumstances and her aspirations, between what America claimed to believe and what America actually practiced.

Another common mistake: treating her relationship with the Wheatley family as simple. Yes, they educated her. Also, yes, they supported her publication. But they also owned her. On top of that, they could sell her, separate her from her husband, or punish her for stepping out of line. Their kindness operated within a framework of fundamental cruelty.

Continue exploring with our guides on south america tierra del fuego map and how many rings does peyton manning have.

And then there's the assumption that her poetry was purely religious. While many of her poems deal with Christian themes, she was also deeply engaged with classical literature, contemporary politics, and the question of what it meant to be both African and American.

What Actually Worked for Her

If you're looking for practical lessons from Phillis Wheatley's life, here are a few that still ring true:

She built networks. Despite being enslaved, she cultivated relationships with prominent figures like John Adams, Benjamin Rush, and the Countess of Huntingdon. These connections weren't accidental — they were strategic. She understood that publication required advocates, and she positioned herself to find them.

She mastered the tools of her time. Rather than rejecting English poetry, she became its expert. She studied the forms, learned the conventions, and then used them to smuggle in ideas that challenged the status quo. Sometimes the best way to subvert a system is to become better at it than the people who created it.

She refused to be erased. Even when people tried to define her by her circumstances — "the African girl," "the slave poetess" — she insisted on complexity. Her writing shows a woman who was simultaneously grateful to the Wheatleys, critical of slavery, devoted to her faith, and fiercely intelligent about her position in the world.

She took risks. Publishing a book as a Black woman in 1773 meant risking everything. She could have been attacked, imprisoned, or worse. But she calculated that the potential rewards — literary recognition, financial independence, moral authority — were worth the danger.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Phillis Wheatley actually a good poet?
By the standards of her time, yes. She mastered the dominant poetic forms, displayed genuine emotional range, and tackled complex theological and philosophical questions. Modern critics have been more mixed, but her technical skill is undeniable.

Did she ever gain her freedom?
Yes, but not easily. After John Wheatley's death in 1777, Susanna Wheatley struggled financially and tried to re-enslave Phillis. Phillis had to sue for her freedom in court, winning her case in 1784. She was about 25 years old.

What happened to her after she was freed?
She married John Peters, a free Black barber, and tried to support herself through teaching and writing. She died in poverty in 1784, likely from complications of breast cancer, at around age 31. Her husband had abandoned her and their three children.

**Why did she go to London to

She traveled to London in 1773 to secure a publisher for her collection and to demonstrate that an enslaved woman could master the refined art of English verse. The trip was arranged by the Wheatleys, who hoped that the prestige of a London audience would translate into financial support and, perhaps more importantly, a measure of social legitimacy. In the capital she met influential patrons, including the Earl of Dartmouth and the renowned poet Alexander Pope’s circle, and she was received with a mixture of curiosity and admiration. Her public readings and the publication of Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral* in 1773 not only secured a modest income but also placed her name in the educated discourse of the era, challenging prevailing assumptions about race and intellect.

Beyond the immediate practical benefits, the London venture expanded her intellectual horizons. In practice, surrounded by the literary salons and scientific societies of the Enlightenment, she encountered new ideas about governance, liberty, and human rights. But these conversations seeped into her later poems, where she began to weave more overt critiques of tyranny and calls for universal moral virtue. The experience also reinforced her conviction that mastery of the dominant literary forms could be leveraged as a platform for subtle subversion.

In the decades that followed, Wheatley’s work continued to ripple through American and Black literary traditions. Early African‑American poets such as Jupiter Hammon and later figures like Paul Laurence Dunbar cited her as a precedent for using classical forms to articulate Black experience. But nineteenth‑century abolitionists reprinted her verses to illustrate the intellectual capacity of enslaved people, while twentieth‑century civil‑rights activists reclaimed her voice as a testament to resilience and self‑definition. Modern scholars, meanwhile, have highlighted the complexity of her stance — her simultaneous reverence for Christian doctrine, her nuanced commentary on slavery, and her engagement with the political debates of her day — showing that her legacy is far richer than a simple “first Black poet” label.

Wheatley’s life illustrates how strategic networking, technical proficiency, and an unyielding claim to humanity can intersect to produce lasting cultural impact. Also, though she faced legal battles, financial instability, and personal loss, she consistently positioned herself at the crossroads of art and advocacy, using the tools of her time to carve out a space where she could speak truth to power. Her story remains a powerful reminder that the pursuit of artistic excellence and the fight for dignity are not mutually exclusive, but mutually reinforcing.

In sum, Phillis Wheatley’s journey from a enslaved girl in Boston to a celebrated poet in London, and finally to a revered — if often overlooked — figure in American letters, underscores the enduring power of intellect, perseverance, and strategic agency. Her legacy endures not only in the poems she penned but also in the pathways she forged for future generations to claim their own voices, even when the world sought to silence them.